No one wants to be named in a Notary lawsuit that can cost you time, stress and legal fees. But happens more than you might think, even when you thought you did everything right.
Merchants Bonding Company, the carrier for NNA bonds and insurance policies, recently shared a number of Notary claims with the Notary Bulletin. These claims show lessons you need to know about financial liability resulting from the notarizations you perform.
The Case of the Stubborn Plaintiff
In this case, a Notary was asked to visit a hospital and notarize a power of attorney document. The document granted the signer’s friend the right to handle his medical and legal affairs while he was hospitalized. The signer later filed a lawsuit against the Notary, claiming he was not aware of what he was signing.
During the case, the plaintiff was declared a “vexatious litigant” by the court after it was learned he had a history of filing frivolous lawsuits. The Notary’s attorney claimed the grounds for the suit were legally insufficient and the court upheld this claim.
But, the plaintiff didn’t stop. He filed a second suit against the Notary and several other defendants a year later. Eventually the second case was settled, but not until the Notary incurred additional attorney fees in responding to the new allegations.
Liability Lesson #1
This case teaches an important lesson. Litigation can get messy, and sometimes litigants don’t give up. As a result, you can incur significant costs in defending yourself — even against frivolous claims. In this instance, the Notary had an errors and omissions insurance policy, and it took a substantial amount of the policy to defend the Notary in both actions. Without a policy with sufficient coverage to absorb all the costs, he would have had to pay the expenses out of his own pocket.
The Case of the Notary Caught in the Crossfire
Some Notaries assume that they don’t have to carry an E&O policy as long as they don’t make mistakes. As this next case shows, even a blameless Notary can be dragged into a lawsuit.
In this situation, the Notary was among several individuals sued for more than $200,000 over a real estate transaction. The litigant claimed the Notary had failed to properly check a signer’s identity during the transaction. Later investigation acquitted the Notary of all wrongdoing.
However, the lawsuit proved extremely difficult — and costly — to resolve because of the multiple complaints and cross-complaints involving the numerous defendants.
Liability Lesson #2
Your financial risk as a Notary often has nothing to do with being right. You can be right and still end up with legal bills. Fortunately, the Notary’s E&O policy in this case paid the legal expenses.
The Case of the Costly Thumbprint
In this case, an oversight when recording a journal entry got a Notary into serious legal trouble. During a notarization involving real property, the Notary was distracted and failed to take the signer’s thumbprint for her journal entry as required by state law. It was later discovered that the signer was an impostor, and the Notary was sued for $250,000.
Liability Lesson #3
After lengthy negotiations, the case was eventually settled, but the Notary’s full E&O policy was exhausted. The lesson here is that E&O insurance will cover claims up to their policy’s limit when Notaries are clearly negligent, as in this case where the Notary forgot to obtain the signer’s thumbprint in the journal entry. It happens; people make mistakes. Even good Notaries make mistakes.
The Case of Multiple Mistakes
As bad as it is for a Notary to be sued after following proper procedure, the situation can be even worse if the Notary ignores state rules when verifying a signer’s identity.
In this case, the Notary was asked to notarize the signatures of two individuals who signed a deed of trust in buying a property. Since the signers had no ID, the Notary identified them using a single credible witness — the agent representing the signers. State law required the Notary to personally know the witness, but the Notary hardly knew the agent. In addition, the Notary failed to obtain the thumbprints of the signers in her journal. The settlement and legal fees were substantial.
Liability Lesson #4
By ignoring the rules for identifying signers and obtaining thumbprints, the Notary in this case not only faced a costly lawsuit but left the transaction vulnerable to potential fraud. In fact, a handwriting expert indicated that it was “highly probable” the signatures notarized on the deed of trust in question were forged. Fortunately for the Notary, the E&O policy covered multiple mistakes in the same claim, which is true of many policies as long as the violations aren’t intentional.